Legal Opinion

Kuhlman v. Findlay

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 25, 2013No. 5-12-21PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Kuhlman v. Findlay,

2013-Ohio-645.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO THIRD APPELLATE DISTRICT HANCOCK COUNTY JERRY KUHLMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, CASE NO. 5-12-21 v. CITY OF FINDLAY, OPINION DEFENDANT-APPELLEE. Appeal from Hancock County Common Pleas Court Trial Court No. 2011-CV-668 Judgment Affirmed Date of Decision: February 25, 2013 APPEARANCES: Michael D. Portnoy for Appellant Donald Rasmussen for Appellee Case No. 5-12-21 WILLAMOWSKI, J. {¶1} Plaintiff-Appellant, Jerry Kuhlman (“Kuhlman”), appeals the judgment of the Hancock County Court of Common Pleas, denying his motion for a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hanson v. Guernsey County Board of CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Hubbell v. City of XeniaOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Fahnbulleh v. StrahanOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Children's Hospital v. Ohio Department of Public WelfareOhio Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. Titanium Metals Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ritchie v. Mahoning Cty.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API