Legal Opinion

Diebert v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 1967No. 65-945PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion

ON REHEARING GRANTED

SWANN, Judge.

Our previous opinion held that a rule to show cause should not issue solely on the basis of “unsworn hearsay statements” made in a tape recording. On petition for rehearing, it was correctly pointed out that this overlooked the decision of the Supreme Court in Baumgartner v. Joughin, 107 Fla. 858, 143 So. 436 (1932). We therefore substitute the following in lieu thereof:

Appellant, Donald Diebert, defendant below, seeks review of a judgment finding him guilty of criminal contempt and a sentence of six months in the County Jail.

The State Attorney filed a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BarnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Ex Parte John D. CrewsSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Baumgartner v. JoughinSupreme Court of Florida · 1932
  4. Ford v. BoegerDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1964

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Starchk v. WittenbergDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Sauls v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API