Tillman v. Thatcher
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Appeal from Lafayette Circuit Court. The note was void for usury. Acts 1887, p. 50, 51; 4Í Ark. 331. The account is thus left to stand upon its original merits. 35 Ark. 217 ; 105 N. Y. 539 ; 12 N. D. Rep. 48; 98 1ST. C. 107; 17 S. W. Rep. 713.
1Opinion of the CourtHughes, J.
The appellee, Thatcher, was indebted to the appellants, merchants at Dallas, Texas, for goods bought of them, in the sum of $355. Thatcher gave his note, dated at Texarkana, Ark., to the appellants for $355, bearing interest from date at 12 per cent per annum, in settlement of the account. The appellants, recognizing that the note was void for usury, sued on the original account. The appellee says the note was a satisfaction of the account, and pleads usury.
The court refused to instruct the jury, at the plaintiff’s instance, that if the jury found from the evidence that the defendant was…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rountree v. . BrinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Humphrey v. McCauleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Marks v. McGeheeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1879
3Cited by9 opinions
- In re T. H. Bunch Co.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1910
- Warmack v. AskewSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Bank of Malvern v. BurtonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
- Johnson v. HullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1893
- Roth v. Merchants' & Planters' BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.