Legal Opinion

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided January 16, 1990No. 88-292PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

Reynolds Brooks appeals his convictions for armed robbery, kidnapping with a weapon, burglary of an occupied conveyance with a weapon, and unlawful possession of a weapon while engaged in a criminal offense. Brooks argues that the trial court erred in failing to conduct an inquiry concerning his request to discharge his court-appointed counsel. We reverse.

In Hardwick v. State, 521 So.2d 1071 (Fla.), cert denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 185, 102 L.Ed.2d 154 (1988), the Florida Supreme Court approved the procedure set forth in Nelson v. State, 274 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 1973), to be applied when a…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Nelson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
  3. Hardwick v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  4. Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  5. Raulerson v. WainwrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kearse v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
  3. Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API