Brierley v. Brierley
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.
The petitioner, subject to the widow’s interest, took an estate for his life in the testator’s farm except the “pine growth.” The other defendants took a vested remainder in all the real estate; their estate in the pine growth to take effect in possession upon the death of the widow, and them estate in the rest of the farm to take effect in possession upon Harry’s death subject to the widow’s rights if she survived him. The testamentary provisions, for the purposes of this case, present the characteristic instance of an estate for life with remainder over. There is no suggestion of a trust.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sanborn v. SanbornSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1882
- Hale v. JaquesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1898
- Fowler v. LaddSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1921
- Reynolds v. JonesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1916
3Cited by2 opinions
- In re Estate of NortonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1991
- Barnes v. First Baptist ChurchSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1927