Legal Opinion
Fan v. Jiang
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided June 23, 2025No. 3:21-cv-00458Unknown
1Opinion
2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 FEI FEI FAN, Case No. 3:21-cv-00458-MMD-CSD 7 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 8 YAN YAO JIANG, 9 Defendant. 10 11 I. SUMMARY 12 Following remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 13 Plaintiff Fei Fei Fan is pursuing a “forced labor claim under 18 U.S.C. § 1589(a)(4) for the 14 2015-2019 period” and related state-law claims against Defendant Yan Yao Jiang. (ECF 15 No. 125 (“Memorandum”) at 3-5; see also ECF No. 130 (executing the Ninth Circuit’s 16 mandate).)1 Before the Court are: (1) Jiang’s motion for judgment…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- David P. Pagtalunan v. George Galaza, Warden Thomas Maddock, Acting Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kor Media Group, LLC v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Supermail Cargo, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellee, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-Appellant. Jerome Grimes v. City and County of San Francisco, Defendant-Cross-Defendant-Appellant, and Nathan Johnson, Defendant-Cross-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.