Legal Opinion

Asber v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided April 8, 1969PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HERRMANN, Justice.

In this appeal from a conviction of robbery, the defendant contends that the manner of his confrontation and identification by the prosecuting witness constituted a denial of due process.

The State adduced evidence establishing the following facts:

Mrs. Eloise Moorehead, operator of a motel, was robbed on January 17, 1967. A man entered the motel office shortly before midnight and threatened her with a gun. He was not masked. He demanded and was given the money in the cash drawer. At that point, Mrs. Moorehead said that she felt faint and told the robber that she had a heart…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Gilbert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Foster v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Raymond Palmer v. C. C. Peyton, Superintendent of the Virginia State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cook v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  2. Foster & Forster v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Moye v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1970
  4. Watson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  5. Bratten v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API