State v. Grant
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BROCK, Judge.
Defendant Grant excepts to the introduction into evidence of photographs for the limited purpose of illustrating the testimony of State’s witness Rex Allen Shirley. Defendant Grant contends that the witness never properly identified the photographs as being the automobile he saw, but stated only that it “looked like” the automobile he saw. This evidence was admitted for the sole purpose of illustrating the witness’ testimony to *725the court and jury. The witness testified that the photographs contained an image like the automobile he observed. This identification is sufficient.…
2Cited by2 opinions
- State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
- State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974