Legal Opinion

State v. Grant

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 25, 1973No. 738SC91PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROCK, Judge.

Defendant Grant excepts to the introduction into evidence of photographs for the limited purpose of illustrating the testimony of State’s witness Rex Allen Shirley. Defendant Grant contends that the witness never properly identified the photographs as being the automobile he saw, but stated only that it “looked like” the automobile he saw. This evidence was admitted for the sole purpose of illustrating the witness’ testimony to *725the court and jury. The witness testified that the photographs contained an image like the automobile he observed. This identification is sufficient.…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. VickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API