Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Wells

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 6, 2012Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1213The record confirms that claimant did not have sufficient earnings in either his basic or alternate base period to file a valid original claim pursuant to Labor Law § 527. For purposes of the basic condition, claimant’s base period covered the period of July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 (see Labor Law § 520 [1]). During this period, claimant was only employed for one calendar quarter and, therefore, did not satisfy the requirements of the basic condition (see Labor Law § 527 [1]; Matter of Stennett [Commissioner of Labor], 54 AD3d 478, 479 [2008]). Turning to the alternate condition,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of StennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. In re the Claim of SotomayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API