In re the Claim of Wells
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
*1213The record confirms that claimant did not have sufficient earnings in either his basic or alternate base period to file a valid original claim pursuant to Labor Law § 527. For purposes of the basic condition, claimant’s base period covered the period of July 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010 (see Labor Law § 520 [1]). During this period, claimant was only employed for one calendar quarter and, therefore, did not satisfy the requirements of the basic condition (see Labor Law § 527 [1]; Matter of Stennett [Commissioner of Labor], 54 AD3d 478, 479 [2008]). Turning to the alternate condition,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re the Claim of StennettAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re the Claim of SotomayorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006