Cumming v. . Brooklyn City Railroad Company
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] PECKHAM, J., reads for affirmance.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
2Cited by15 opinions
- Bain v. Fort Smith Light & Traction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Novak v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1950
- Petrie v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
- Case v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1894
- Cmuk v. Lehigh Valley R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.