Legal Opinion

Cumming v. . Brooklyn City Railroad Company

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1887PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] PECKHAM, J., reads for affirmance.

All concur.

Judgment affirmed.

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Bain v. Fort Smith Light & Traction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. Novak v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1950
  3. Petrie v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. Case v. New York Central & Hudson River RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Cmuk v. Lehigh Valley R.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1941

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API