Legal Opinion

Bird v. Mayer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1859PublishedCited by 1 opinion

ERROR TO CIRCUIT COURT, DANE COUNTY. The complaint in this case averred that the defendants below and plaintiffs in error were indebted for goods, wares and merchandize, sold, &c., and there was appended to it a bill for varnishes, amounting to $253 38. The varnishes are described as wagon and carriage varnishes.

Read the full summary

ERROR TO CIRCUIT COURT, DANE COUNTY. The complaint in this case averred that the defendants below and plaintiffs in error were indebted for goods, wares and merchandize, sold, &c., and there was appended to it a bill for varnishes, amounting to $253 38. The varnishes are described as wagon and carriage varnishes. To this the defendants answered that they were not indebted, &c., for these goods and merchandize; that said plaintiffs, at the time said goods and merchandize were sold to said defendants, warranted the same to be of a good and perfect qualty, and well adapted to the purpose for…

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Smith, J.

This was an action for goods sold by the defendants in error to the plaintiffs in error, viz: A quantity of varnish for the manufacture and finishing of wagons, carriages, &c., to the amount of %253 38 ; to which the defendants answered that the plaintiffs at the time the goods were sold warranted them to be of good and perfect quality, and well adapted to the purpose for which they were manufactured and purchased; that the said articles were not of good and perfect quality nor adapted to the purpose for for which they were manufactured and purchased; that the same were…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Walton v. CodyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1853

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. West Michigan Furniture Co. v. Diamond Glue Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API