Legal Opinion · Concurrence

People v. Hall

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 2000No. 86168Published

1Concurrence

JUSTICE BILANDIC,

specially concurring:

I agree that defendant’s murder conviction and death sentence should be affirmed. Therefore, I join the majority opinion. I write separately, however, as to issue VII, which involves defendant’s fitness for trial while under medication, in order to express the continued adherence to People v. Mitchell, 189 Ill. 2d 312 (2000). In Mitchell, we held that a defendant’s claim that he was denied due process when he did not receive a fitness hearing, although he was taking psychotropic medication, is not cognizable on post-conviction review.

Here, defendant cites…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anthony Hall v. Odie Washington, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  2. People v. MitchellIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  3. People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  4. People v. HallIllinois Supreme Court · 1993
  5. United States Ex Rel. Hall v. WashingtonDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API