Legal Opinion
Jack's Fruit Co. v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc.
Supreme Court of Florida
Decided April 5, 1972No. 41880PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Per curiam
Jack’s Fruit Company has filed with this Court its petition for writ of mandamus or, in the alternative, prohibition, seeking to vacate and stay enforcement of a mandate of the District Court of Appeal, Second District entered pursuant to that court’s opinion in Growers Marketing Service, Inc. v. Conner, 249 So.2d 486 (Fla.App.2d, 1971). We issued the rule nisi.
In essence, petitioner has challenged the jurisdiction of the District Court to hear and consider the merits of the dispute between itself and Growers Marketing Service. The facts of the case are adequately set out in the opinion of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Growers Marketing Service, Inc. v. ConnerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jack's Fruit Co. v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc., Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Jack Goldtrap, D/B/A Jack's Fruit Company, Not Incorporated v. Doyle Conner, Commissioner of Agriculture of the State of Florida, Defendants-Third Party v. Growers Marketing Service, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Goldtrap v. ConnerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976