Legal Opinion
State v. French
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 27, 1987No. C7-86-915PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
Appellant Ronald French was convicted of four counts of felony theft, Minn.Stat. § 609.52, subd. 2(1) and subd. 3(2) (1984), and two counts of receiving stolen property, Minn.Stat. § 609.53, subd. 1(2) (1984), as a result of his sale of stolen property. He claims a restitution order must be vacated as well as three of his convictions, that deposition testimony was used in violation of his confrontation rights and that the evidence was insufficient to sustain his convictions. We affirm but vacate the restitution order and three of appellant’s convictions.
FACTS
Danielle…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- State v. MerrillSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
- State v. LaTourelleSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. BiasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Bellamy v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2017
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- State of Minnesota v. Asa James KingsburyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Damian MataCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.