Legal Opinion

United States v. Kamal Patel

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided February 10, 2015No. 14-2607PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLAUM, Circuit Judge.

Dr. Kamal Patel is a Chicago-area physician who commonly prescribes home health care services for his patients. After federal investigators learned that. Patel had been receiving undisclosed payments from Grand Home Health Care (“Grand”), a home care provider used by some of his patients, Patel was charged with six counts of violating — and one count of conspiring to violate — 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b, otherwise known as the Anti-Kickback Statute. In relevant part, the Statute makes it illegal to “knowingly and willfully solicit[ ] or receive[ ] any remuneration (including…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Liparota v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Maracich v. SpearsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Abramski v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  4. United States v. Chris VernonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2013
  5. United States v. BerkosCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Pyles v. NwaobasiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Guilfoile v. ShieldsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  3. United States v. Grayson Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  4. Stop Illinois Health Care Frau v. Asif SayeedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Simon HongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API