Legal Opinion

Hackney v. Fordson Coal Company

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 21, 1929PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Dietzman

— Affirming'.

A demurrer having been sustained to the petition of the appellant, who was the plaintiff below, and he having declined to plead further, the court dismissed his petition, rand from that judgment he appeals.

By his petition the appellant substantially averred that he was running a general store in Pike county near the mines of the appellee; that he was in no wise con nected with the appellee, but on the contrary was in substantial competition with the appellee’s commissary for the trade and custom of the appellee’s employees; that he had enjoyed…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lepard v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. HaggardCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Grzyb v. EvansKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Davidson v. American Freightways, Inc.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. ReederKentucky Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Hargis v. BaizeKentucky Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Skilcraft Sheetmetal, Inc. v. Kentucky MacHinery, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API