Legal Opinion

Donald R. Ohrum General Construction v. Bumbarger

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided August 27, 1992No. 1530-S-1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

DOWLING, J.,

“Then shall our names,
“Familiar in their mouths as household words ...
“Be in their flowing cups freshly remember’d.” “Henry V,” Act IV, Scene 3.

*204This controversy finds its roots in the interpretation of the name, “Donald R. Ohrum General Construction.” Defendants Sharon C. Bumbarger and Linda L. Lehman aver in their preliminary objection to plaintiff’s complaint that plaintiff has no standing to maintain his suit, contending that the plaintiff is not a corporation or an individual or partnership registered under the “Fictitious Names Act” and is therefore precluded from bringing…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Facilities Management Corp. v. BiesterCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Estate of PewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Southwest Germantown Community Development Corp. v. Concerned NeighborsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API