Legal Opinion

Allen v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 14, 1984No. 84-7Published

1Opinion of the Court

Darrell Hickman, Justice.

The appellee, Louise Smith, owns an interest in a lot in Clarendon, Arkansas, that Alice Allen, the appellant, claims as her homestead. Allen’s husband, who is deceased, was a tenant in common with two others, one of whom was Smith’s predecessor in interest. After Allen’s husband died, Smith filed suit for partition. Allen defended with the argument that the property was her homestead and could not be partitioned. The chancellor was right in holding that Allen could only claim homestead in her husband’s one-third interest and we affirm.

Article 9 § 6 of the Arkansas…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nichols v. ShearonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1886
  2. Stuckey v. HornSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
  3. Best v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  4. Sulcer v. Northwestern National Ins.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  5. Gibson v. GibsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API