Legal Opinion

Cook v. Miller

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 30, 1925PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.

The order of the trial court for an examination of the person of the plaintiff wife was a proper exercise of discretion. The discretionary right to make such an order would seem to flow legitimately from the right of a defendant to call an injured plaintiff as a witness and compel his testimony as to his injuries, or to cross-examine him relative thereto, if he testifies in his own behalf. While in a large number of States this matter is one of statutory regulation, in the States where no such regulation obtains, the decided preponderance of authority favors the right of the trier in his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wanek v. City of WinonaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Aillon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  2. People Ex Rel. Noren v. DempseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Home Oil Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  4. Aillon v. StateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
  5. State v. EspositoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API