Corak Construction Corp. v. Scott

CARROLL, Judge,

Appellant contracted with the appellees for sale to them of a lot, and of a house to be constructed thereon by appellant. The contract did not contain plans and specifications but provided that the house was to be "substantially similar to model #260” in a designated subdivision, and was to be constructed “substantially similar to the model house.”

The purchasers observed the construction of the house as it progressed, and moved their furniture into the house when it was completed. Later, on the day before the scheduled closing the purchasers announced their refusal to complete…