Legal Opinion

Duffy v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 9, 1912PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal' from Emmet District Court. — Hon. A. D. Bailie, Judge. Action at law for damages for breach of contract. There was judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Evans, J".

The parties were owners of adjoining land in Emmet county. The defendant was resident of such county, and the plaintiff was a resident of Illinois. They entered into a contract in relation to the proposed drainage of their respective lands. The natural course of drainage extended from the northwest toward the southeast, carrying the overflow in that direction. The higher land is that of the plaintiff. It adjoins the land of the defendant on the west. The course of drainage referred to extends diagonally across the land of the defendant for a distance of six thousand feet. There was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. S. Rosenberger & Co. v. W. R. Marsh & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Thomas v. Town of BrooklynSupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
  3. Hall v. DoranSupreme Court of Iowa · 1858
  4. Sheldon v. BoothSupreme Court of Iowa · 1878
  5. Tabor v. FoySupreme Court of Iowa · 1881

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jackman v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  2. Collinson v. City of DubuqueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API