Legal Opinion
Oriental Commercial & Shipping Co. v. Rosseel, N.V.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 12, 1991No. 90 Civ. 6127 (RWS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendant Rosseel, N.Y. (“Rosseel”) has moved pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), Fed.R.Civ. P., to dismiss the complaint of plaintiffs Oriental Commercial & Shipping Co. (U.K.), Ltd. (“OC & S-UK”), Oriental Commercial & Shipping Co., Ltd., (“OC & S”) and Abdul Hamid Bokhari (“Bokhari”) (collectively, “Oriental”), or in the alternative, for summary judgment under Rule 56. For the following reasons, the motion for summary judgment is granted and the complaint is dismissed.
The Parties
OC & S is a Saudi Arabian corporation engaged in the petroleum business. OC & S-UK is an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Victrix Steamship Co. v. Salen Dry Cargo A.B.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- The Island Territory of Curacao v. Solitron Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
- Linda F. Steele v. L.F. Rothschild & Co., IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- First Investment Corp. of Marshall Islands v. Fujian Mawei ShipbuildingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- New Bank of New England, N.A. v. Toronto-Dominion BankDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
- Adkins v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Concra v. International Fidelity InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- Adkins v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009