Legal Opinion
John Auriemma v. James Montgomery and Donald Hubert
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided December 1, 1988No. 88-1072PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MANION, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs filed a civil suit against several defendants, including two municipal attorneys, alleging violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681 through § 1681t. The municipal attorneys filed a motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ claims against them, contending that they were absolutely immune from suit. The district court denied their motion. We affirm.
I
NATURE OF THE CASE
This FCRA action arises out of two lawsuits filed by current or former members of the Chicago Police Department against the City of Chicago and various city officials. The first…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Snell v. TunnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Billie M. Ireland v. Gary L. Tunis, Richard Thompson, John Meiers, and Richard D. KuhnCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Snell v. TunnellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- James Brunson v. Scott MurrayCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
- Joan M. Steffes v. Stepan CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.