Armstrong v. Killen
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Story District- Court. Aotion at law to -recover the reasonable value of work and labor performed by the plaintiff for the defendant. Trial by jury. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant-appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtSeevers, J.
The errors assigned are: (1) Tbe verdict is contrary to law. (2) The verdict is contrary to the evidence. (3) The court erred in admitting testimony on the trial. (4) The court erred in excluding testimony on the trial. (5) The court erred in the instructions given to the jury. (6) The court erred in permitting the plaintiff to amend her petition. (7) The court erred in overruling defendant’s motion in arrest of judgment, and for a new trial.
Counsel for the appellee insists that the assignments of error are not sufficiently specific. This is clearly so as to the first, third, fourth and…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Casey v. Ballou Banking Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Porter v. LongMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
- Moffitt v. AlbertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
- Buford v. DevoeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
- Hannibal H. Chandler & Co. v. E. Knott & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1892