Legal Opinion

Mikhail Murray v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 3, 2015No. 14-0990PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm Appellant’s conviction without comment, but remand to the trial court to correct scrivener’s errors in the written sentence and order of probation. The written sentence contains a special provision that Appellant not possess any weapons, guns, or blunt objects, while the trial court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing was that Appellant “is not to possess any weapons. No guns, knives, or blunt objects he intends to be used as a weapon.” The written order of probation contains a similar special condition to Appellant’s probation and an erroneous indication that Appellant had “been…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fisher v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  2. Knight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Braswell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API