Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Barry v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided May 28, 2014No. 1:13-cv-00457PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FLSA; 29 U.S.C. § 216(b); Collective Action; Conditional Certification; Class Definition; Class Notice; Statute of Limitations

OPINION AND ORDER

KAPLAN, Judge:

Plaintiffs are current and former GS-1801 Immigration Officers (IOs) and GS-0132 Intelligence Research Specialists (IRSs) with the United States Department of Homeland Security (DHS), United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Office of Fraud Detection and National Security. Until February 12, 2012, USCIS designated plaintiffs’ positions as exempt 1 from the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Hoffmann v. Sbarro, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
  3. Larry Butler v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  4. Cameron-Grant v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Espinoza v. 953 Associates LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. 1 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021
  2. 1 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  3. Ardon v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2024
  4. Boggs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
  5. Doe No. 1 v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API