Helmer v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LUCERO, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs David Helmer and Felicia Muftic 1 represent a certified class of homeowners who contend a radiant-heating hose, the Entran 3, manufactured by Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company (“Goodyear”) suffered design defects leading to .cracks and leaks. At trial, Goodyear argued the leaks were caused by third parties’ improper installations. The jury returned a verdict in favor of Goodyear, concluding the Entran 3 was not defectively designed. On appeal, Plaintiffs argue that insufficient evidence supported the district court’s instruction on nonparty fault. They further…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Yeager v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- People v. LutherSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- Elm Ridge Exploration Company v. EngleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Uptain v. Huntington Lab, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Peaje Investments LLC v. Garcia-PadillaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Cramer v. Union Pacific RR. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2026
- Cramer v. Union Pacific RR. Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2026