State v. Hubbard
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Hickory Circuit Court. — Ho». Argus Cox, Judge. < (1) The indictment is bad for the want of an allegation that defendant represented the value of the mortgaged cattle, or that they were good security for the loan, or unincumbered. State v. ■ Barbee, 136. Mo. 440. (2) The failure of the indictment to more fully describe the cattle, loan and mortgage deprived defendant of his constitutional right to he informed of the “nature and cause of the accusation.”
Read the full summary
Appeal from Hickory Circuit Court. — Ho». Argus Cox, Judge. < (1) The indictment is bad for the want of an allegation that defendant represented the value of the mortgaged cattle, or that they were good security for the loan, or unincumbered. State v. ■ Barbee, 136. Mo. 440. (2) The failure of the indictment to more fully describe the cattle, loan and mortgage deprived defendant of his constitutional right to he informed of the “nature and cause of the accusation.” Constitution, art. 2, see. 22; State v. Barbee, supra; State v. Stowe, 132 Mo. 199; State v. Murphy, 141 Mó. 267; State v.…
1Opinion of the CourtBurgess, J.
The defendant was indicted, convicted, and his punishment fixed at four years in the penitentiary, under section 3564, Revised Statutes 1889, for obtaining $550 from the Hickory County Bank, through its president, W. H. Liggett, by means of false representations and pretenses.
The indictment charges that Walter Hubbard on or about April 22, 1898, at the said county of Hickory and State aforesaid, did, then and there, unlawfully, feloniously and designedly, with intent to cheat and defraud a certain private bank, organized under and by virtue of the laws of Missouri, to-wit, the Hickory-County…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. FooksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Belden v. . MeekerNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- State v. StoweSupreme Court of Missouri · 1896
- State v. SaundersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1876
- State v. PhelanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1900
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. BowdrySupreme Court of Missouri · 1940
- State v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1916
- State v. ChickSupreme Court of Missouri · 1920
- State v. FoleySupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
- State v. SanfordSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.