Legal Opinion

Sadler v. Whitehurst

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided March 17, 1887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from decrees of chancery court of city of Kichmond, pronounced June 5, 1885, July 9, 18§5, and July 10, 1885, respectively, in the cause of Whitehurst & Owen v. Sadler & Wright and others. The defendants demurred to the bill, and the court overruling the same the defendants appealed. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the CourtFauntleroy, J.

Whitehurst & Owen, the plaintiffs in this suit, suing, as they say in their bill, for themselves and all other creditors of Sadler & Wright, and for the creditors of the estate ■of R. S. Sadler, the deceased partner, and the creditors of F. E. Wright, the surviving partner of Sadler & Wright, filed their bill in this suit against F. E. Wright in his own right; against F. E. Wright, as surviving partner of Sadler & Wright; against Sue E. Sadler in her own right, as devisee of.R S. Sadler, deceased; against Sue E. Sadler, as executrix of R S. Sadler, deceased; and against Virgie W. Sadler and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brinkerhoff v. BrownNew York Court of Chancery · 1822
  2. Stuart's heirs v. CoalterCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 1826
  3. Dunn v. DunnSupreme Court of Virginia · 1875

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Millhiser & Co. v. McKinley, Rangeley & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1900
  2. Bresee v. BradfieldSupreme Court of Virginia · 1901
  3. Simmons &c. Co. v. Bank of GreenwoodSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1894
  4. Baltimore Steam Packet Co. v. Williams & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1897
  5. Sheldon v. Armstead's Adm'rSupreme Court of Virginia · 1851

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API