Stadelman v. Johnson
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtMay, J.
The plaintiffs appeal a final summary judgment in which the trial court concluded that Progressive American Insurance Company [Progressive] did not provide uninsured motorist coverage to the plaintiffs. They raise two issues: 1) the court *1002erred as a matter of law in its interpretation of a policy exclusion; and 2) there is a genuine issue of material fact concerning the insurer’s compliance with section 627.727(9), Florida Statutes (2001). We affirm the court’s interpretation of the policy exclusion, but reverse the summary judgment on the limited factual issue of the insurer’s compliance…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Government Employees Ins. Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Florida · 1995
- Omar v. Allstate Ins. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Schutt v. ATLANTA CAS. COMPANIESDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
3Cited by1 opinion
- Allstate Fire & Cas. Ins. Co. v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals · 2013