People v. Surety Insurance
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WOOLPERT, J.
If a defendant misses a required appearance and appears later, after the court has ordered bail forfeited, can the judge effectively reinstate the bond and continue the defendant on the same bail without notice to the surety? Our answer is that it depends. On what? The timing.
If we seem to treat this appellate issue too lightly, in riddle form, we do so in the belief that the bail status of the defendant and his or her surety should not depend upon appellate ingenuity in applying general, “jurisdictional” legislation to practical courtroom events of a frequent nature. As we…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- People v. United Bonding InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Phillips v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- People v. McAllisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- People v. Wilshire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
- People v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- County of Los Angeles v. Financial Casualty & Surety, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2016
- People v. Bankers Ins. Co., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- People v. Bankers Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2019