Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hamilton

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 20, 1971No. Appeal, 588PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Pomeroy,

On March 20, 1968, appellant William Hamilton was tried before a jury and found guilty of murder in the first degree under our felony-murder rule. Following denial of post-trial motions by the court en banc, Hamilton was sentenced to life imprisonment. The primary question presented for our consideration is whether, in the absence of any Miranda warning, 2 an oral confession made by appellant while in the custody of police officers in response to an accusation by a co-conspirator was properly admitted in evidence over timely objection by defense counsel. 3

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Commonwealth v. SimalaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Commonwealth v. BordnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Commonwealth v. WillmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. YountSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Commonwealth v. SherardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. State v. LaddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  5. United States v. Pedro Angel GomezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API