Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ex parte Pruett

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 2015No. WR-62,099-05Published

1Dissent

DISSENTING STATEMENT

Alcala, J.,

filed a dissenting statement.

The legislature recently enacted three statutes addressing the inherently ques*539tionable nature of inmate testimony, the prejudicial impact of junk science, and the problems that occur when the state does not fully participate in discovery with the defense, and this snakebit case is riddled with each of those problems. I would grant the motion to stay this impending execution for a capital-murder conviction against Robert Lynn Pruett, applicant, on the basis that this court should fully consider the merits of his complaint that junk…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PruettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2005
  2. Robert Pruett v. William Stephens, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API