Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pookman v. SCH. DIST. OF UP. ST. CLAIR TP.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 20, 1984No. 39 W.D. Appeal Docket 1984Published

1DissentNix, Chief Justice

At the time that appellees were furloughed, they were entitled to tenured professional status, under section 1108(b) of the Public School Code, Act of March 10, 1949, P.L. 30, art. XI, § 1108(b), as amended, 24 P.S. § 11-1108(b) (Supp.1984-85),1 and thus entitled to all appropriate seniority rights. 24 P.S. § 11-1125.1(a) (Supp.1984-85); Welsko v. School Board of School District of Foster Township, 383 Pa. 390, 119 A.2d 43 (1956); Bragg v. School District of Swarthmore, 337 Pa. 363, 11 A.2d 152 (1940); Tressler v. Upper Dublin School District, 30 Pa.Commw. 171, 373 A.2d 755 (1977); Phillipi…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phillippi v. School District of Springfield TownshipCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Welsko v. Foster Township School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. Bragg v. Swarthmore School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Tressler v. Upper Dublin School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. Jersey Shore Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API