Legal Opinion

Opinion No.

Arkansas Attorney General Reports

Decided June 12, 1992Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Honorable Carolyn Pollan State Representative 400 North 8th Street Fort Smith, AR 72901

Dear Representative Pollan:

This is in response to your request for an opinion on whether the Department of Finance and Administration ("DFA") is interpreting A.C.A. § 26-52-103(a)(4) too broadly in that their interpretation requires the payment of state sales tax on the new federal "luxury" tax.

It is my opinion that the interpretation given A.C.A. §26-52-103(a)(4) by DFA is inconsistent with Arkansas law.

Your question is prompted by a constituent who purchased a new car, the price of which exceeded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Belvedere Sand & Gravel Co. v. HeathSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
  2. Ragland v. Miller Trane Service Agency, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Ferguson v. Cook, Comm. of RevenuesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  4. Pledger v. Simpson Press, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API