Legal Opinion
King v. Hampton
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided May 18, 1976No. Civ. A. 75-621-NPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
CLARKE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Archer E. King, III, was removed from his position as an Electronics Engineer (GS-0855-9, Step 10) at the Naval Air Rework Facility, Norfolk, Virginia, for inefficiency in the performance of his duties. The plaintiff appealed the decision of the aeronautical Engineering Head, Naval Air Rework Facility, sustaining plaintiff’s termination through the United States Civil Service Commission prior to instituting this action. All administrative remedies have been exhausted and the matter is properly before the Court on the defendants’ Motion for…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Charles S. Thomas, Secretary of the Department of the Navy v. William E. WardCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
- Halsey v. NitzeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
- Charles R. Armstrong v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Frank H. De Fino v. Robert S. McNamara Secretary of DfenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- Claude H. Weaver v. Merit Systems Protection BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- King v. HamptonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Wolf v. Personnel Advisory BoardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- PHH Corp. v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.