Legal Opinion

Nonotuck Silk Co. v. Fair

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 15, 1873PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorton, J.

This is an action of contract to recover the price of goods sold. The defence relied on was, that the goods were sold on a credit of thirty days, and therefore the suit was prematurely brought.

The plaintiff proved the sale and delivery of the goods, the bill of parcels- accompanying the delivery containing the clause, “ Terms cash, 5 per cent, off.” To meet this primá fade case of the plaintiff, the defendant “ offered the evidence of three witnesses as to their own course of dealing with the plaintiff at their place of business in Northampton (none of the witnesses knew of the dealings of…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDonough v. Evans Marble Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1902
  2. Smith v. Alaskan Fur CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  3. Marshall v. PerrySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877
  4. Norton v. University of MaineSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1910
  5. Fahy v. Irving Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API