Legal Opinion

Bolden v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 5, 2009No. 5D08-718PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The facts in this case are virtually identical to the facts in Adams v. State, 942 So.2d 1024 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006). Nine days after the imposition of his sentence, Bolden moved to withdraw his plea. Five days later, and before the motion could be heard, Bolden filed a notice of appeal. The trial court erroneously ruled that it lacked jurisdiction to hear the motion. Id.; see also Smith v. State, 900 So.2d 732, 733 (Fla. 4th DCA 2005) (recognizing that where timely motion to withdraw plea is pending when notice of appeal is filed, trial court still has jurisdiction to decide motion).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Micah C. Davidson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API