Legal Opinion

State v. Faddoul

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided August 16, 1933PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThaxter, J.

The intention in this case was to prosecute the respondent for the crime described in Section 24 of Chap. 138, Rev. Stat. 1930. The statutory offense is set forth as follows :

“Persons burning their own property to defraud insurers; penalty. R. S. c. 128, sec. 22. If an owner or person in any way concerned, interested or in possession of any building, goods, or other property, insured against loss or damage by fire, wilfully burns the same or causes it to be burned, with intent to defraud the insurer, he shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year, nor more than twenty years.”

T…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Swallow v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1852

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Logan v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970
  2. State v. DumaisSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1940
  3. State v. WardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1960
  4. Haller v. StateSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API