Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided February 5, 2001No. 3294PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STILWELL, Judge:

Nathaniel Williams appeals his convictions for possession of a stolen vehicle and failure to stop for a blue light on the ground that the trial court’s Allen1 charge was unduly coercive. We affirm.

FACTS

Williams was tried on Tuesday, April 20, 1999. The jury began deliberations at 3:45 p.m. At 5:10 p.m. the jury requested the arresting officer’s testimony be replayed, then resumed its deliberations at 5:30 p.m. At 6:00 p.m. the judge sent the jury home for the evening. The jury resumed deliberations at 9:30 a.m. the following day. At 11:00 a.m. they sent the judge a note…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. State v. TorrenceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. State v. ElmoreSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  4. Tucker v. CatoeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
  5. State v. LynnSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  2. Johnson ex rel. Estate of Valenzuela v. Sam English Grading, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2015
  3. State v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API