Legal Opinion

Flanaghan v. Phenix Ins.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1896PublishedCited by 12 opinions

cited 35 W. Ya. 667. cited 35 W. Ya. 667; 39 W. Ya. 658; 6 W. Ya. 438, 508; 41 W. Ya. 229.

1Opinion of the Court

Dent, Judge:

Zimri Flanaghan instituted suit in the Circuit Court of Ritchie county on a fire insurance policy against the Phe-nix Insurance Company.

The company filed its plea in bar, claiming that plaintiff had not complied with the conditions of the policy, especially clause 9 thereof, which is in the following words, to wit (in so far as involved in this suit): “(9) Persons sustaining loss or damage hy fire shall forthwith give notice of said loss in writing to the company, and, within thirty days of the occurrence of said loss, render a particular account of such loss, signed and sworn to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnson v. BurnsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Akers v. De WittWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Adkins v. Globe Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Maynard v. National Fire Insurance Co. of HartfordWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Teter v. Franklin Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Rosenthall Co. v. Scottish Ins.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Ragland v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API