Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Copenhefer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2007No. 375 CAPPublishedCited by 123 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Justice EAKIN.

Appellant appeals from the order denying his petition under the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA), 42 Pa.C.S. §§ 9541-9546, as untimely. We affirm.

Appellant was convicted of first degree murder and sentenced to death.1 On direct appeal, he claimed the trial court erred by failing to instruct the jury at the penalty phase that his lack of prior record constituted a mitigating circumstance. *106The prosecution and defense stipulated appellant had no prior record, and defense counsel requested a jury instruction indicating this fact must be found as a mitigating factor. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FreemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. Commonwealth v. Abdul-SalaamSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Commonwealth v. CopenheferSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Commonwealth v. Abu-JamalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by123 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GarciaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  2. Commonwealth v. SeskeySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  3. Commonwealth v. LeggettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  4. Commonwealth v. WojtaszekSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. Commonwealth v. GandySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API