Legal Opinion
Conoco, Inc. v. Phipps
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided September 12, 1989No. 72321PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REYNOLDS, Judge:
Petitioner contends the Workers’ Compensation Court erred in holding that Respondent sustained 40% permanent partial disability as a result of injury to his heart arising out of and in the course of his employment. Petitioner contends that the claim by Respondent was barred by 85 O.S.1981 § 43.
The trial court held that the statute of limitations was tolled by the failure of the Petitioner to advise the Respondent of his right to file a claim. The Workers’ Compensation Court, sitting en banc, modified the order of the trial court and made a specific finding…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Knott v. Halliburton ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Bodine v. Crane CarrierSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Moore v. Tom Morris EnterprisesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1976
- Bruce v. T.G. & Y. Stores Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1983
3Cited by2 opinions
- Givens v. Anchor Packing, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Givens v. Anchor Packing, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991