Legal Opinion

Automobile Brokerage Corp. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided March 3, 1930No. 5046PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Chief Justice.

This ease relates to an order of the police court denying the claim of an intervener for a lien upon an automobile which had been seized when used in the illegal transportation of intoxicating liquors.

It appears that on July 25, 1928, the Curry-Stout Motor Company, dealers in automobiles, sold a Reo coupé .ear to one Louis Malinow of Baltimore, at the price of $1,880. A credit of $700 upon the price was allowed in trade for a used ear, and the balance was made payable in monthly installments maturing during the succeeding twelve months. The purchaser executed his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jackson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  2. United States v. SylvesterDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1921
  3. Oakland Motor Car Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1924
  4. United States v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1920
  5. Commonwealth v. Certain Intoxicating LiquorsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1877

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re Adoption of a MinorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  2. Hines v. ParegolCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1935
  3. Robbins v. NewbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  4. Cogswell v. AikenDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API