Legal Opinion
Hurst v. General Dynamics Corp.
Court of Chancery of Delaware
Decided May 11, 1990No. Civ. A. 9735PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JACOBS, Vice Chancellor.
The plaintiffs, who hold common shares of Asbestos Corporation Limited, a Canadian corporation, (“ACL”), bring this action individually and on behalf of a class of ACL shareholders allegedly injured by certain transactions that occurred between 1982 and 1986, and were related to the acquisition of ACL’s corporate parent by the Province of Quebec. The plaintiffs named as defendants General Dynamics Corporation, a Delaware corporation (“General Dynamics”), and three of its directors. The parties later stipulated to the dismissal, without prejudice, of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Patricia Thomas v. Capital Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
- Lloyd Lieb, Trading as Specialized Cassettes v. Topstone Industries, Inc., and D. Robbins & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- McWane Cast Iron Pipe Corp. v. McDowell-Wellman Engineering Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1970
- Jesus Zuniga v. United Can Company and Driver-Salesmen, Produce Workers, and Helpers, Local 588, Retail Delivery DriversCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- McDermott Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Crumplar v. Superior Court ex rel. New Castle CountySupreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- CRE Niagara Holdings, LLC v. Resorts Group, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 2021
- EnVen Energy Corporation v. David M. Dunwoody, Jr., and Oilfield Pipe of Texas, LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2020
- GlobalTranz Enterprises, Inc. v. PNC Bank, N.A.Superior Court of Delaware · 2020
- HupanSuperior Court of Delaware · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.