Legal Opinion

State v. Arrocha

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided January 18, 2002No. 86,720PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Beier, J.;

The State appeals the district court’s dismissal of charges against John Arrocha because he was not brought to trial within 90 days of arraignment as required by K.S.A. 22-3402(1). We must decide whether Arrocha was being held in custody solely because of the charges in this case and whether the district court erred in attributing certain periods between arraignment and dismissal to the State.

K.S.A. 22-3402(1) requires a criminal defendant charged with a crime to be brought to trial within 90 days of arraignment if he or she is being held in custody solely because of that crime. If…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SouthardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  2. State v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 2001
  4. State v. BiardaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2000

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Sola-Morales v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  2. State v. BrownleeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
  3. State v. DupreeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2016
  4. State v. VaughnSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  5. State v. BrownSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API