Legal Opinion

Lane v. Dickinson State Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 17, 1980No. 17708PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDEN, Justice.

Troy W. Lane, II, appeals from the granting of a motion for summary judgment which alleged that Lane’s petition failed to state a cause of action against the appel-lees, Dickinson State Bank and its president, John F. Austin. Lane complains only that the trial court erred in granting the appellees’ motion for summary judgment because his pleadings did state a legal cause of action. The unsworn petition of the plaintiff, general denials, and the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendants were the only instruments before the trial court.

Lane sued the appellees and…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. City of Houston v. Clear Creek Basin AuthorityTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hidalgo v. Surety Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Pace Corporation v. JacksonTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  4. First National Bank in Canyon v. GambleTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Tigrett v. PointerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Zahra Spiritual Trust v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
  2. Stewart & Stevenson Services, Inc. v. Serv-Tech, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1994
  3. Spencer v. City of Seagoville, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1985
  4. Buckley v. AbuzirAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  5. Phillips v. United Heritage Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API