Legal Opinion

Forde v. Industrial Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1965PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGordon, J.

The Industrial Commission found that George and Leona Forde were not solely dependent for support upon their son, Lyle, and we believe that such determination must be upheld.

The record shows that there were a number of sources of support for the claimants other than their son, Lyle. George Forde had some small ($350) earnings from his sales of cattle feed. Even though George Forde used Lyle’s automobile in connection with this sales work, the commission could nevertheless treat such earnings as an item of *667support not wholly supplied by Lyle. In addition, Leona Forde earned $25 harvesting…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McKesson-Fuller-Morrisson Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Fitz v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Beem v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Cherry v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Neumann v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Larson v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API