Legal Opinion

Bridges v. Cepolk Corp.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 12, 2014No. 13-1051PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THIBODEAUX, Chief Judge.

|,The plaintiff, Cynthia Bridges as Secretary of the Louisiana Department of Revenue (“the Department”), appeals the trial court judgment denying its motion for summary judgment, and granting the cross-motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant taxpayer, Cepolk Corporation (“Cepolk”). Finding that the Department proved that the movable items purchased by Cepolk were subject to sales and use tax, and that Cepolk did not meet its burden of proving an exemption to the taxes, we reverse the judgment in favor of Cepolk and grant summary judgment to the Department.

I

IS…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Samaha v. RauSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  2. Duncan v. USAA Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  3. Bonin v. Westport Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  4. Gray v. American Nat. Property & Cas. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  5. State v. J. Watts Kearny SonsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hanks v. Louisiana CompaniesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Boyance v. United Fire & Cas. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  3. Prof'l Fluid Servs., LLC v. Norsk Bronnservice ASLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  4. Sam v. Genesis Behavioral Hosp., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
  5. In re Willow Bend Ventures, L.L.C.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API