Legal Opinion

Worley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 6, 1918No. 9389PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Indictment for murder; conviction of manslaughter; from Elbert superior court — Judge W. L. Hodges. November 24, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, P. J.

1. Statutory provisions respecting the drawing of juries are directory merely; and irregularities therein, unless plainly operating to the prejudice of the challenger, form no ground for challenge to the array. Rafe v. State, 20 Ga. 60; Woolfolk v. State, 85 Ga. 69, 88 (11 S. E. 814) Governor v. State, 5 Ga. App. 357 (63 S. E. 241); 1 Thompson on Trials, § 34, p. 32.(a) The above ruling is not contrary to the decision in Cochran v. State, 62 Qa. 731; for there a new trial was given solely because the mandatory requirement of the statute, as to the putting of the array upon the defendant, was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Woolfolk v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  2. Deal v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Rafe v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
  4. Deal v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Governor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tiller v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  2. Coleman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
  3. Louisville N. R. Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. McIntosh v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  5. Forth v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API